Search: Site   Web
Left Turn ~ Progressive politics in the Pikes Peak region

Morse slams Penry, gives the gift of math

February 7th, 2010, 1:14 pm by Beth Payne

The Senate Majority Press Office issued the following press release Friday:

Today, Senate Democrats responded to the Republicans “plan” to balance the budget and to oppose the budget balancing plan discussed on the Senate floor today with House Bills 1189-1199.  Yesterday the Republicans offered an ill-conceived plan to balance the budget which didn’t quite add up.  Today, Senate Majority Leader John Morse (D-Colorado Springs) addressed it on the Senate floor, as he held up a copy of “Cliff’s Notes: Basic Math”:

Senator Morse’s statement: “Today, I present the Minority Leader with the Cliff Notes version of Basic Math.  Because your math is so far off I’ve gotten you a book on math.  And I’ve gotten you a Cliff’s notes version since you are coming at the 11th hour. With great honor I give you this book and look forward to your proposal.”

“After reading the Republican budget fix it is quite clear that they can’t add or subtract.  The budget shortfall is $1 billion.  The Republicans proposed a reckless “off the cuff” idea to fire state employees to save $17.8 million. $17.8 million in cuts to solve a $1 billion shortfall. Now they just need to come up with 50 more plans so the math will add up.  The problem is their plan doesn’t even identify the first $17.8 million.

“The Governor’s budget proposal cuts state spending by $700 million.  Removing corporate tax credits and exemptions provide the balance of the $300 million needed to balance the budget.  It’s a balanced approach to serious financial crisis. It preserves as best it can our core values.   It protects the most vulnerable of our citizens.  It asks everyone to pull together during these tough times. The Governor’s plan demonstrates leadership.  There’s an old saying that if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.  It’s time the Republicans either offer a serious solution or get out of the way.”

Morse vented his irritation with Republicans at the Democratic El Paso County Central Committee Meeting yesterday. A former CPA, Morse claims that he immediately sensed something fishy with the numbers conservatives were touting. After his rant on the Senate floor, The Denver Post caught up with Republicans, who were already distancing themselves from their heinous math:

Senate Republicans now say their figures have been misinterpreted. On Thursday, they put out a statement that said their budget proposal “includes a 0.25 percent reduction in state payroll spending for the current fiscal year, and a 4.4 percent reduction for next fiscal year.” They also said the plan “would require Democrat Gov. Bill Ritter to cut the state’s $3.2 billion state payroll budget by $19 million for the current fiscal year.” Republicans said the plan would save $306 million in the next fiscal year.

Republican staff told reporters that the 0.25 percent figure pertained to payroll.

But by Friday evening, they said that what they meant was that they were calling for a 0.25 percent cut in the state’s total general fund operating budget. That’s roughly $7.5 billion.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

State Senator rants about Obama, bombs, and Bill Ayers

January 27th, 2010, 9:41 pm by Beth Payne

Republican State Senator Shawn Mitchell took anti-Obama politics to a new low in a recent status update posted to Facebook Wednesday night during the State of the Union Address:

What does this hustler know about creating jobs, opportunity, or wealth? “Community Organizers” don’t increase the pie. They help people move faster in line to get a piece. He’s earnest but has not a clue. NOT A CLUE. 40 years ago he would have been planting bombs with Bill Ayers to bring down the oppressor.

Bill Ayers was co-founder of the 1960s revolutionary group Weather Underground, which gained recognition for its bombing of public buildings. Obama was previously linked to Ayers during his presidential campaign because they served together on the board of an anti-poverty group, the Woods Fund of Chicago, from 1999-2002.

Perhaps Sen. Mitchell will be the next Colorado representative to earn on a place on Keith Olbermann’s illustrious “Worst Person in the World” list.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

Suthers to vote against 3 Supreme Court justices

January 25th, 2010, 3:16 pm by Beth Payne

Colorado Attorney General John Suthers said he will vote not to retain three state Supreme Court justices, according to the conservative blog The Business Word.

Suthers’ statement aligns him with the conservative action group Clear the Bench Colorado, an organization dedicated to ousting the four justices up for re-election in November. Its website describes our Supreme Court as “the most partisan in the nation” and the TABOR amendment is the second resource listed on its references page.

Suthers must have realized this isn’t exactly the sort of movement an Attorney General should be associated with. “I should not have gotten into any of that,” he told the The Denver Post. “I regret the conversation.”

But Clear the Bench isn’t letting him off that easily. “When the highest-ranking law enforcement official in the state says he thinks the highest justices in our state are not worthy of continuing in office, that’s big news,” Matthew Arnold, director of Clear the Bench Colorado, told the Post.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

Gardner won’t run for City Council

January 14th, 2010, 11:24 am by Beth Payne

Local progressive Dave Gardner will not run for City Council in the 2011 elections, he announced in an email broadcast last night. Gardner ran unsuccessfully against Jerry Heimlicher for the District 3 seat last spring and applied again for the position after Heimlicher announced his resignation in the fall. As many as seven council seats could be available next year.

Gardner states in his email that he wants to focus on production of his upcoming movie, Hooked on Growth, scheduled for release in 2010. The movie intends to illustrate “that a prosperity strategy based on perpetual growth is simply unsustainable.” He remarks,

I’ve been finding it impossible to keep abreast of current events in our city, to remain involved and engaged as much as I desire, to support the many worthwhile organizations and initiatives, and to manage completion of this non-profit film project. Something has to give.


Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

Penry for lieutenant governor?

January 12th, 2010, 12:04 pm by Beth Payne

An article in the Colorado Springs Business Journal may have unintentionally given readers a clue about the identity of Scott McInnis’ future gubernatorial running mate. The Journal notes:

Senate Minority Leader Josh Penry, R-Fruita, is introducing a bill to combine state agencies and offer financial incentives to school districts to cut costs. His bill would abolish the position of executive director of the Department of Local Affairs and give those responsibilities to the lieutenant governor, whose only real duty is overseeing Indian affairs.

Penry has denied any intention to serve as McInnis’ lieutenant governor since his withdrawal from the gubernatorial race in November. He seemed to prefer his current role as Senate Minority Leader, an equally prestigious but more influential position. But late last month Penry announced he won’t be seeking reelection to the Senate.

If Penry is successful in changing the lieutenant governor’s job to one which carries a little more weight, he may decide to run with McInnis after all. In October he decried the so-called Lite Gov. position as one lacking “real responsibilities.”

After Penry’s unexpected withdrawal from the gubernatorial race, McInnis took heat from tea-party activist groups who rallied at the capital in protest against “manipulation of the voting process.” A McInnis/Penry ticket could attract disgruntled voters who feel they were denied the chance to vote for their favored candidate in a primary.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

Complaint filed against anti-tax ballot measures

January 7th, 2010, 8:46 pm by Beth Payne

A committee formed to combat three anti-tax November ballot proposals has filed a complaint with the Secretary of State’s office, alleging that proponents of the measures violated campaign finance laws by failing “to disclose  contributions or expenditures” accrued in gathering signatures and maintaining a website.

Protect Colorado’s Communities filed the grievance on January 4 against the organizers of Amendment 60, Amendment 61 and Proposition 101. The complaint claims that the issues’ promoters “spent well more than $200 to print and circulate petitions to place the measures on the ballot and failed to report the donors who are behind their effort.” Petitioners for the proposals collected over 280,000 signatures.

“You don’t get three initiatives on the ballot without spending thousands of dollars - or winking and nodding while someone else does it for you,” said Mark Grueskin, the attorney who filed the complaint for PCC. “The law is clear: the public has a right to know who is funding these anti-government efforts.  These complaints just ask, what - and who - are these proponents hiding?”

The three measures have already received criticism for their potentially devastating impact on Colorado’s economy. Their passage could generate as much as $2 billion in revenue cuts for state and local governments, even as we face a $1 billion budget shortfall.

Amendment 60 would reduce property taxes and Amendment 61 would prevent the state from borrowing money while placing restrictions on local government loans. Proposition 101 would reduce vehicle registration fees to $1 for older cars and $2 for newer cars, which PCC claims would result in the fee “cost[ing] more to collect than it would provide in revenue.” It would also eliminate telecommunication fees, except those for 911 service, and reduce the state income tax from 4.63% to 3.5%.

Click here to read the Bell Policy Center’s analyses on Proposition 101 and Amendment 61.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

Jane Norton wants to abolish Department of Education

December 24th, 2009, 3:03 pm by Beth Payne

Republican Senate candidate and former Lt. Governor Jane Norton wants to abolish the federal Department of Education. A conservative blogger who attended a meet-and-greet with Norton reported:

Mrs. Norton said all the right things regarding small government, low spending and low taxes. One thing I found especially interesting was that she felt that the federal Department of Education was part of the bloat that should be cut. Completely. It was her opinion that individual states should be responsible for education in the state and the federal government should stay out of it.

Norton’s campaign manager, Norm Cummings, responded to questions about the post, remarking that he “didn’t know the context” but “the comment fits with Norton’s belief that local control of the schools is best.”

He told the Colorado Independent the idea is not that radical, adding that Norton “believes state and local control is better than having [schools] taken over by the federal government… She supports a return to a balance that has state and local jurisdictions as preeminent, empowering parents rather than bureaucrats.”

Norton’s anti-government sentiments will help her score points with the Tea-Party movement, something which gubernatorial candidate Scott McInnis has failed to do recently. She’s currently the favored Republican front-runner, but she’s got to maintain that edge to defeat former state Senator Tom Wiens and Weld County District Attorney Ken Buck in a primary.

Norton will have to be the favored candidate with tea-party voters to win the primary, but to do this she’s got to spout extremism which will alienate moderates and independents. McInnis is treading the same thin line right now: after he bullied Penry into withdrawing from the race for governor, Fox News declared he was the “Tea-Party backed Candidate.” Problem is that he wasn’t. To clear up this little snafu, McInnis may ask Penry to be his running mate, which could pacify voters who feel they were denied a chance to choose their favored candidate in the primary.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

Chuck Norris claims health care reform would abort baby Jesus

December 21st, 2009, 12:53 pm by Beth Payne

Chuck Norris is the newest celebrity to contribute his vast intellectual powers to the question of health care reform. He recently posted a column on two conservative blogs, Human Events and Town Hall, which manages to somehow connect the passage of health care reform with the abortion of Jesus:

Lastly, as we near the eve of another Christmas, I wonder: What would have happened if Mother Mary had been covered by Obamacare? What if that young, poor and uninsured teenage woman had been provided the federal funds (via Obamacare) and facilities (via Planned Parenthood, etc.) to avoid the ridicule, ostracizing, persecution and possible stoning because of her out-of-wedlock pregnancy? Imagine all the great souls who could have been erased from history and the influence of mankind if their parents had been as progressive as Washington’s wise men and women! Will Obamacare morph into Herodcare for the unborn?

Wow, try to keep up with that logic! Offering health insurance to thirty million people and lowering the federal budget deficit equals . . . the death of Jesus? This may be the worst logical disconnect we’ve seen in arguments opposing health care reform, but it’s not the only one (why are the words “death panel” coming to mind?)

Norris ends with a sneak peek at the title of his upcoming Christmas column, “Away With the Manger,” which he describes as “about how the feds are whitewashing America’s Judeo-Christian heritage via a progressive, politically correct and pro-Muslim platform.” I’m breathless with anticipation.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

Merrifield to run for County Commissioner

December 3rd, 2009, 3:36 pm by Beth Payne

Rep. Michael Merrifield has served as a state legislator in House District 18 for nearly eight years. But now he’s eyeing a different seat: El Paso County Commissioner. Merrifield will formally announce his candidacy for Commissioner District 5 at Hooked on Books, 3918 Maizeland Road, at 1:00 on Saturday, December 12.

The seat hasn’t been held by a Democrat since the 1970s, but Merrifield isn’t daunted. “This is a very winnable district, and I believe that my record of open-mindedness, approachability and responsiveness to my constituents will work in my favor.” He points out that only 37% of voters in district 5 are registered Republicans, and adds, “I’ve proven my ability to get support from independents and moderate Republicans.”

Merrifield is term-limited next year and is running to replace Commissioner Jim Bensberg, who also faces term limits. Five Republicans are currently vying for the seat: Peggy Littleton, David Williams, Patrick Carter, Ed Jones and William Guevera.

Prior to his time in office, Rep. Merrifield worked as a public-school teacher for thirty years. He is currently Chair of the House Education Committee and serves on the House Transportation and Energy Committee.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

Boy refuses to say pledge of allegiance

November 29th, 2009, 4:27 pm by Beth Payne

Will Phillips, a 10-year-old boy from Washington County in Arkansas, refuses to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in class. He maintains, “There really isn’t liberty and justice for all. Gays and lesbians can’t marry. There’s still a lot of racism and sexism in the world.” Until gays and lesbians have equal rights, Phillips says, he doesn’t want to say the pledge.

Phillips told the Arkansas Times that he argued with his substitute teacher, who tried to make him say the pledge and threatened to tell his mother if he didn’t.

“She got a lot more angry and raised her voice and brought my mom and my grandma up,” Will said. “I was fuming and was too furious to really pay attention to what she was saying. After a few minutes, I said, ‘With all due respect, ma’am, you can go jump off a bridge.’ ”

Will was sent to the office, where he was given an assignment to look up information about the flag and what it represents. Meanwhile, the principal called his mother.

When Phillips’ mother asked for an apology from the teacher, his principal responded, “Well, I don’t think that’s necessary at this point.”

Phillips, who hopes to be a lawyer, has since been harassed by his classmates. “In the lunchroom and in the hallway, they’ve been making comments and doing pranks, and calling me gay,” he said. “It’s always the same people, walking up and calling me a gaywad.”

In 1943, the Supreme Court ruled in West Virgina State Board of Education v. Barnette that a student’s right not to say the pledge or perform the flag salute is protected under the First Amendment.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site